British
Messianic Jewish Alliance “Chai” magazine spring 2005: Issue 223
Book
Review
Contours of Pauline Theology
A Radical New Survey of the Influences on Paul's
Biblical Writings
Tom Holland
2004 Mentor: Christian Focus Publications
ISBN 1-85792-469-X
In this book Tom Holland is
introducing to mainstream biblical scholarship what the Messianic movement has
been saying about Paul for many years. With scholarly insight and uplifting
erudition Tom Holland is making Paul kosher again, demonstrating that the
apostle was not, as is sometimes claimed, a self-hating Jew who transformed a
good rabbi called Yeshua into a powerful divinity in order to give his new
religion an edge over the Greek pantheon of gods.
Tom challenges the current
tide of scholarly opinion about Paul by stating that the apostle’s theology can
be properly understood only in the light of his Jewish background. In order to
correctly read Paul’s writings we must view them through the lenses of Passover
and the “New Exodus” spoken of by the later prophets.
Holland takes issue with the
liberal reading of Paul, demonstrating that the apostle departed neither from
the teachings of Yeshua nor the Tanach. The assertion that the gospel passed
through a three-fold evolution from the original message preached by Yeshua in
Judea, which was altered for the Diaspora Jews and finally Hellenised for the
Gentiles, is shown to be erroneous. New Testament scholarship has become so
bad, says Holland, that biblical scholar Mark Nanos has to state what is to
some of us blindingly obvious: “We can now read the New Testament as a Jewish
book.” (p.15) As Americans say: “Duh!”
Chapter two provides a
brilliant insight into Paul’s use of the book of Isaiah to map out the history
of salvation. Equally refreshing is Holland’s critique in chapter three of
liberal methodology: “It was not from Athens that the writers of the New
Testament had drawn their understanding, but from Jerusalem.” (p.52). Liberal
scholarship, founded on unsubstantiated assumptions, is now facing serious
questions about its continued promotion of outdated methodology. A similar
error, but at the opposite end of the spectrum, is an uncritical acceptance by
some scholars of the Pseudepigrapha. The warning issued by Holland is
particularly relevant to the area where the Messianic movement intersects with
the Hebrew Roots movement because the key to a true understanding of the New
Testament is the Tanach.
“We must make every effort
to free ourselves from unrecognised presuppositions that have enslaved Paul in
a Greek prison” (p.82), says Holland. As an example of such effort he
challenges the assumption that Paul’s use of the word doulos is based on
the idea of a Greek “slave”. He argues that it is more accurate to see Paul’s
“servant” imagery rooted in the Old Testament ebed, as in Isaiah’s
“servant” of the Lord.
Tom Holland works through
various issues in the rest of the book applying his thesis that Paul can be
understood only through Jewish eyes. The insights he provides and the
conclusion he comes to are challenging and fascinating. Chapters five and six,
in particular, demand concentration. There is lots of interesting and in-depth
interaction with the views of other scholars, but some readers might prefer to
go straight to the conclusions of those chapters to get to Holland’s own views.
Particularly interesting is his focus on the themes of the “New Exodus” and
Passover Community. Tom Holland’s conclusion is that the Passover and a
corporate reading of the texts relating to it are the two required lenses if we
are to understand not only Paul but the rest of the New Testament.
Despite
having one occurrence of unnecessary supercessionism (page 104-105) which adds
nothing to his argument, this book is still excellent. Contours of Pauline Theology is a valuable
tool for those in the Messianic movement who want to understand the New
Testament, and those in the wider body of Messiah who are confused because they
have been taught to read a thoroughly Jewish book through Greek lenses.
Richard Gibson,
Editor of Chai